Legal Opinion

Jacalyn Chapman v. Salesforce, Inc., Lori Castillo Martinez and John Does 1–10 (said names being fictitious); and ABC Corporations 1–10 (said corporations being fictitious)

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 9, 2026No. 2:25-cv-12363Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JACALYN CHAPMAN, No. 2:25-cv-12363 Plaintiff, (MEF)(MAH) v. OPINION and ORDER SALESFORCE, INC. LORI CASTILLO MARTINEZ and JOHN DOES 1–10 (said names being fictitious); and ABC CORPORATIONS 1–10(said corporations being fictitious), Defendants. Table of Contents I. Background II. A Valid Agreement? A. The Law B. The Agreements C. Analysis III. Scope IV. Conclusion * * * I. Background A woman1 (“the Plaintiff”) sued her former employer2 and supervisor3 (together, “the Defendants”) for workplace discrimination and retaliation. See Complaint,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API