Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard O. Bertoli Podvey, Sachs, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner & Cocoziello, Court-Appointed Standby Counsel for Richard O. Bertoli
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 7, 1993No. 92-5182PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant law firm, Podvey, Sachs, Mea-nor; Catenacci, Hildner & Cocoziello (“Pod-vey, Sachs” or “firm”), 1 seeks to appeal an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey appointing the firm standby counsel for its former client, Richard Bertoli (“Bertoli”), in the government’s criminal action against him. In the course of pretrial proceedings in that action, Bertoli discharged Podvey, Sachs and elected to proceed pro se. He does not qualify for indigent status. Among other things, the order requires the firm to serve…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MoussaouiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- State v. ReddishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.