Bennett v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LATIMER, Justice.
The first part of this opinion is concurred in by all members' of the court. The latter part dealing with excessive damages is concurred in by the Chief Justice only, so that the views expressed and the action taken by Mr. Justice Wade, Mr. Justice Wolfe, and Mr. Justice McDonough require an affirmance of the judgment.
This case involves an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment for damages suffered by respondent while he was employed by appellant as a head brakeman. The cause of action is founded on the rights and liabilities created by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jensen v. Denver & Rio Grande Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
- Pauly v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- Falkenberg v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- McAfee v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duffy v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
- McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Rutherford v. Bass Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Mitchell v. ARROWHEAD FREIGHT LINES, LIMITEDUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Watkins v. Utah Poultry & Farmers CooperativeUtah Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.