Legal Opinion

Stockdale v. Eads

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

The present appeal is the third appearance of the same action before this Court. Eads v. Stockdale, 310 Ky. 446, 220 S.W.2d 971; Stockdale v. Eads, 314 Ky. 384, 235 S.W.2d 998. On the first appeal, a judgment for $2,765 in favor of the present appellant, for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, was reversed because of misconduct of a juror in falsely answering questions on voir dire examination. On the second appeal, we reversed a judgment for appellees because the court had improperly sustained a motion for .a peremptory instruction. The third trial was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Crutcher v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Eads v. StockdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Stockdale v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Redwine v. FitzhughWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Daniel v. H. B. Rice & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  3. Horn Transfer Lines, Inc. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  4. O. L. Cain's Administrator v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  5. Redwine v. FitzhughWyoming Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API