Robinson v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Sharon and Marty Robinson appeal an order terminating their parental rights in their daughter A.R. They contend the State failed to prove that necessary services were offered or provided to help them correct their parenting deficiencies. They also argue the State failed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, by making no effort to modify parenting classes or other training services to accommodate their mental impairments. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural Posture
A.R., born December 1, 1990, is the only child of the Robinsons. Sharon Robinson is moderately…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re the Welfare of SumeyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re AWCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- VanDam v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- In Re DayWashington Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In re TerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Department of Social & Health Services v. GilfillenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Adoption of GregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- In re Antony B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re the Welfare of S.J.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.