Legal Opinion

McDowell v. City of Barberton, Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1930No. 5374PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Barberton, Ohio, owned and operated water works under the management and control of its director of public service. His authority is found in sections 3957 and 3958, Ohio General Code. 1 In virtue thereof, he promulgated certain regulations having the effect of ordinances, to wit: That charges for water shall b,e made against the premises supplied and the bill sent to the last known address of the owner; that water rents shall be due quarterly and if not paid within thirty days the water may be turned" off; that new ownership of premises shall not eliminate the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Arnold v. Mayor of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. In re J. Menist & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In Re Farmers Frozen Food CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963
  3. Matter of Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  4. In Re AyalaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1983
  5. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Norris (In Re Norris)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API