Legal Opinion

Adams v. Trigg

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Cooper Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBates, Judge

There is no final judgment in this case. The record shows a trial and a verdict for the defendant, and proceeds as follows : “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf sustained, and that he have thereof his execution.” There is no “ final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. (Young v. Stonebreaker and others, 33 Mo. 117.)

The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

Judge Dryden concurs ; Judge Bay absent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. StonebreakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dusing v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Lipe v. FoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. People ex rel. Phillips v. SeversonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Dusing v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API