Legal Opinion

Paull v. Paull

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1991No. Nos. 59249, 59250PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHAN, Judge.

These two appeals stem from a series of orders the trial court entered on May 23, 1990, September 25, 1990, September 27, 1990, and October 18, 1990, wherein the trial court enforced a settlement agreement entered into among three corporations and four stockholders in said corporations. Two stockholders and the three corporations currently challenge the terms of the enforcement orders. We remand.

At the outset, an explanation of the host of characters in this almost ten year controversy is necessary. Albert Pauli (“Albert”) and his son, Richard Pauli (“Richard”), are the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lappe and Associates, Inc. v. PalmenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Cain v. RichartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Jordan v. StallingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In Re Marriage of SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Goodman v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Damien Echols v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API