Cain v. Richart
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
Plaintiff John W. Cain, acting pro se, brought this action against defendants Ric-hart and Gulick. Plaintiffs action is an action for recovery of damages on account of defendant’s negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. Both defendants moved the court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 74.04. On July 5, 1988, summary judgment was entered for defendant Gulick; on September 28, 1988, summary judgment was entered for defendant Richart. Plaintiff thereafter appealed to this court.
Both defendants have moved the court to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Labor Discount Center, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Wipfler v. BaslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Schlanger v. SimonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Delf v. CartwrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Environmental Quality Research, Inc. v. Mercantile Trust National Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Miller-Stauch Construction Co. v. Williams-Bungart Electric, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Nolfo v. DubinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Frasher ex rel. Autenrieth v. WhitsellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Paull v. PaullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.