Kolkman v. People

I concur in the views expressed in the opinion of my brother Butler, but since I believe there are additional reasons why the judgment should be reversed I propose to set them out at some length.

I am in accord with the statement of the rule concerning conspiracy and the admission of testimony showing-statements made by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the common design. Such seems to be settled by the decisions of this court. Davis v. People, 22 Colo. 1, 43 Pac. 122; Johnson v. People, 33 Colo. 224, 80 Pac. 133. But as I view the record considerable of the testimony admitted is…