Legal Opinion

Tammy E. Young v. Kohl's, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 23, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00134Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI TAMMY E. YOUNG, : Case No. 1:24-cv-134 Plaintiff, 2 Judge Matthew W. McFarland KOHL'’S, INC., Defendant. ORDER AND OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 7, 10). Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 17), to which Defendant filed a Reply in Support (Doc. 18). Plaintiff then filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. 19). Thus, this matter is ripe for the Court's review. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API