Tammy E. Young v. Kohl's, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI TAMMY E. YOUNG, : Case No. 1:24-cv-134 Plaintiff, 2 Judge Matthew W. McFarland KOHL'’S, INC., Defendant. ORDER AND OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 7, 10). Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 17), to which Defendant filed a Reply in Support (Doc. 18). Plaintiff then filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. 19). Thus, this matter is ripe for the Court's review. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.