Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Howard

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1958No. 6347PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The appellees, plaintiffs below, a copartnership which designs and builds mechanical equipment brought suit against Robert A. Howard and Walter Moore as copartners by representation in Mining Investment and Exploration Co. for rental and damages to a rig leased by plaintiffs to defendants.

Defendants answered denying that Mining Investment and Exploration Co. was a partnership and alleged that it was the individual business of the defendant Howard, and counterclaimed alleging that the machinery would not perform as represented.

Defendants’ attorney withdrew and defendant Moore…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. KnoxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  2. West Side Trust Co. v. GascoigneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Puritan Manufacturing Co. v. Toti & GradiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Ag Services of America, Inc. v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. South Second Livestock Auction, Inc. v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Anderson Hay and Grain Co. v. DunnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cheesecake Factory, Inc. v. BainesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API