Legal Opinion

In re Eldridge

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 1, 1875No. Case No. 4,331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, District Judge.

It cannot now be doubted that the federal courts are bound to pay the same regard to the statutes of states limiting the time within which actions may be brought, as is paid them by the state courts. [Shelby v. Guy] 11 Wheat. [24 U. S.] 361; [M’Clung v. Silliman] 3 Pet [28 U. S.] 270; [Green v. Neal] .6 Pet. [31 U. S.] 291; [Ross v. Duval] 13 Pet [38 U. S.] 45; [U. S. v. Wiley] 11 Wall. [78 U. S.] 513; [Levy v. Stewart] Id. 249; [Stewart v. Kahn] Id. 493; [Hanger v. Abbott] 6 Wall. [73 U. S.] 532; and also 1 Stat. 92, § 34.

It is equally well settled that courts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bryar v. WillcocksNew York Supreme Court · 1824

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trustees of Mutual Building Fund & Dollar Savings Bank v. BosseiuxDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1880
  2. Nonotuck Silk Co. v. PritzkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API