In re Eldridge
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, District Judge.
It cannot now be doubted that the federal courts are bound to pay the same regard to the statutes of states limiting the time within which actions may be brought, as is paid them by the state courts. [Shelby v. Guy] 11 Wheat. [24 U. S.] 361; [M’Clung v. Silliman] 3 Pet [28 U. S.] 270; [Green v. Neal] .6 Pet. [31 U. S.] 291; [Ross v. Duval] 13 Pet [38 U. S.] 45; [U. S. v. Wiley] 11 Wall. [78 U. S.] 513; [Levy v. Stewart] Id. 249; [Stewart v. Kahn] Id. 493; [Hanger v. Abbott] 6 Wall. [73 U. S.] 532; and also 1 Stat. 92, § 34.
It is equally well settled that courts of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bryar v. WillcocksNew York Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trustees of Mutual Building Fund & Dollar Savings Bank v. BosseiuxDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1880
- Nonotuck Silk Co. v. PritzkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908