Legal Opinion
Petition of Oskar Tiedemann and Company
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 8, 1964No. 1764, 1765PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, District Judge.
On April 14,1960, this Court appointed a Commissioner to hear and report findings on a large number of claims for personal injuries and deaths resulting from a collision in the Delaware River on March 7,1957, between the S. S. Mission San Francisco (Mission) and the Elna II (Elna).
The Commissioner heard and disposed of some fifty odd claims to which the following exceptions have been filed.
THE BLACK CLAIM
Julius Black, Administrator of the Estate of David Black (hereafter called Black) filed two claims, one under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, against Mathiasen’s 1 as…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States Steel Corporation v. LampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- In Re the Complaint of Sincere Navigation Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Dugas v. National Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.