Legal Opinion

State v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 24, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Indictment for larceny. On motion in arrest of judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtTilling-hast, J.

The defendant, John L. O’Brien, having pleaded nolo contendere to the indictment in this case charging him with the crime of larceny, now comes and moves in arrest of judgment, 'specifying a number of grounds therefor, which may be summarized as follows: First, because the record does not show the number and names of the persons who served on the grand jury at the time the indictment purports to have been found; second, because it does not show that this particular indictment was ever found and returned, !‘a true bill” by the grand jury ; and third, because it nowhere appears in the record…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  3. Brozosky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Teslovich Et Ux. v. Fire. F. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. State v. BrantonOregon Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API