Legal Opinion
Lawrence E. Furey, Trustee v. City of Sacramento, a Chartered City, County of Sacramento and Natomas Sanitation District of Sacramento County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1986No. 84-2429PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Lawrence Furey appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants City of Sacramento and other municipal government entities. Furey claims that his property was taken in violation of the United States Constitution when his land was assessed to pay for the construction of a sewer system and the defendants subsequently prevented him from developing his land and thereby making use of the sewer. We affirm the judgment of the district court. 1
I
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff Lawrence Furey owns, as a trustee, approximately 1,157 acres in the Natomas area of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Austin v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lena R. Schnuck v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.