Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bell v. Staacke

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1902No. L.A. No. 1155Published

1DissentBeatty, C. J.

I dissent. Conceding, as I must, that the order dismissing this appeal on the ground that the notice was prematurely filed is sustained by a long and unbroken line of decisions, commencing with McLaughlin v. Doherty, 54 Cal. 519, and coming down to Estate of Devincenzi, 131 Cal. 452, I am still of the opinion that it is not too late to correct what I am convinced was an erroneous construction of section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure, adopted in the decision first above cited, and ever since followed, without consideration of the injustice to litigants and inconvenience to this court,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gray v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Genella v. RelyeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Los Angeles County Bank v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Peck v. CourtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API