Peck v. Courtis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, Santa Cruz County. The defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.:
Action for partition of the Soquel Rancho. The appeal is: Firstly—From an order made April 22d, 1863, overruling appellant’s exceptions to the referee’s report. Secondly— From an order of the same date denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. Thirdly—From an interlocutory judgment, of the same date, settling the rights of the parties and determining that a partition should be made. Fourthly, and lastly—From the final judgment in the case.
It is claimed by respondents that the appeals from such orders and judgmerits as are proper subjects of appeal were not taken…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gray v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Camp Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.