Legal Opinion

Mize v. Pennington Gap Bank, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 21, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

In November, 1920, S. B. Poteet instituted a chancery suit against T. B. Ely, et als, the purpose of which was *268to enforce the payment of certain liens by subjecting the real estate of the defendants to sale. Only a portion of the lands involved in that suit, namely the 144 acre tract and the fifty-nine acre tract are involved upon the present appeal. Process was duly served upon each of the defendants, hut none of them answered. The two tracts involved here were owned by T. B. Ely and were sold under decrees entered in that cause in June and October, 1922, by Special Commissioner Davidson to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurt v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  2. Brown v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. Dermott v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  4. Redd v. DyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  5. Neff v. WoodingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re GriffinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
  2. Chaney v. KiblerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API