General Electric Co. v. New England Electric Mfg. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On pleas to bill filed by defendant company and Schlessinger and Mears, its selling agents.
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
By setting down a plea for argument, the complainant admits its truth and denies its sufficiency. Burrell v. Hackley (C. C.) 35 Fed. 833.
There is, then, before the court, the bill and the pleas, with the truth of the facts alleged in the latter admitted. The bill was filed December 13, 1902, and alleges infringement of the Swan patent, No. 516,844. The pleas admit that the defendants had made and sold apparatus called “receptacles 9174,” which are alleged in the bill to have been infringements; that up to August, 1902, they made and sold them in good faith and without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Odell v. StoutUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
- Burrell v. HackleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kennicott Water Softener Co. v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
- Cayuta Wheel & Foundry Co. v. Kennedy Valve Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903