Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Yeo v. Ulibarri
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1929No. 3440PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT '
WATSON, J.
The judgment appealed from is a peremptory mandamus to the state auditor and the state treasurer, at the suit of the state on the relation of the state engineer, directing those officials to honor certain appropriations made by the last Legislature from the “permanent water reservoirs for irrigation purposes income fund.”
Laws 1929, ch. 162, makes an appropriation from said fund
“To make or cause to be made, investigations as to the feasibility of storage reservoirs and canals for the purpose of' irrigation and for the reclamation of unproductive lands located in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Ervien v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. ErvienCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Lake Arthur Drainage Dist. v. FieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Bryant v. Board of Loan CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Overton v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Interstate Stream Commission v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Shepard v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Maloney v. SierraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Maloney v. SierraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970