Legal Opinion

Frank W. Whitcomb Construction Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 8, 1984No. 82-448PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of Taxes (Commissioner) from an order of the Washington Superior Court finding that a use tax levied on an airplane owned by the Frank W. Whitcomb Construction Corporation (Taxpayer) must be apportioned according to the percentage of time the aircraft was used in Vermont. Because Taxpayer has failed to sustain its burden of showing that apportionment is required in this case, we reverse.

Taxpayer engages in substantial "Vermont activities although its corporate headquarters and principal place of business are within the State of New Hampshire. Vermont…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Nissan North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. General Motors Corp. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Director of Revenue v. Superior Aircraft Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Bigelow v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API