Legal Opinion
Belding Heminway Co. v. Future Fashions, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from advertising or offering for sale, or taking or filling orders for the sale or delivery, of dress goods claimed to infringe plaintiff’s design patent No. 134490.
The patented design consists of three rows of daisy like figures, each interlocking with the other, the petals on the two outer rows being of a-white or light color with a dark center row of much the same style of figures, with the petals of the color of the center of the other two rows and the center the color of the petals on the outer…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Du Bois v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gandy v. Main Belting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
- Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
- Future Fashions v. American Surety Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944