Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation of Easement for Highway Purposes Over Property of Darrah

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1963No. 273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

In 1957 the state of Ohio, Department of Highways, appropriated a portion of the appellee’s land upon which was situated a residence. Thereafter, on December 19, 1961, a resolution and finding was filed by the state appropriating the remainder of the parcel.

The second and subject appropriation action was necessitated by a change of plans resulting in a relocation and enlargement of a ramp extending from the original right of way northerly to state Route No. 43.

During the course of the trial evidence was adduced showing that the area of this parcel was less than 15,000 square feet; that it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Roads Commission v. WarrinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Board of Com'rs of State Inst. v. TALLAHASSEE B. & T. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masheter v. KebeOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Masheter v. Ohio Holding Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Masheter v. Mariemont, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API