Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Thomas C. Sinkovich
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2000No. 97-2634PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIDENER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (Underwriters), brought this case for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. against defendant, Thomas C. Sinkovich, for resolution of a dispute involving Underwriters’s hull insurance policy for Sinkovich’s yacht. The district court found that Sinkovich did not fulfill the policy’s terms and held that Underwriters was not obligated to pay Sinko-vich the insurance proceeds. For the reasons stated below, we vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this case for a new trial.
On the morning of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ampat/midwest, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Cross-Appellant, and Triangle Fastener Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Charles C. Randolph, D/B/A Hardens Fried Chicken v. Collectramatic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Michael Robert PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Betty Jordan v. Kelly BinnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. FelizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.