Legal Opinion
United States v. Gressett
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 8, 1991No. 91-40001-04 to 91-40001-06PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
On July 26, 1991, the court held a hearing on a number of pretrial motions filed by the defendants. The purpose of this memorandum and order is to memorialize the rulings made by the court at the hearing and to address the unresolved motions. In resolving these motions, the court recognizes, pursuant to the order of the magistrate judge, that each defendant is deemed to have joined in all motions not “opted out” of within three days after filing. The court notes that none of the defendants has opted out from the motions filed by co-defendants.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. LoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Bryan S. CouchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- United States v. StoeckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.