Legal Opinion

Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 20, 2008No. Case C07-1189RAJPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on a motion (Dkt. # 20) from Defendant Auto-desk, Inc. (“Autodesk”) to either dismiss Plaintiff Timothy Vernor’s complaint for failure to state a claim, or to grant summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES the motion.

II. BACKGROUND

Mr. Vernor makes his living selling goods on eBay, the well-known internet auction site. He has two packages of Au-todesk’s copyrighted AutoCAD software, and hopes to sell them on eBay. He brought this action for declaratory relief because Autodesk’s past…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Al-Bustani v. AlgerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  3. Equine Legal Solutions, PC v. DigitalOcean, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  4. United States v. HaasDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API