Legal Opinion

Vukovich v. De Bartolo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*260OPINION

By ROBERTS, J.

Other testimony corroborative of the tes^ timony of Bertha Cemeriek, hereinabove quoted, was given in the case. This, then, is the uncontradicted evidence as to how the accident happened. Upon being directed to “get out”, the other children, except the little girl in question, who was injured, ran across the pavement to the southerly side. This little girl did not turn and run, but staring, as the witness says, at the man who was telling her to “get out,” and who was waving a stick toward and over her, evidently in great fear, and perhaps thinking that she could better…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sprung v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API