Sprung v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
No. 2989.
BY THE COURT:
• Submitted on application oí appellant for rehearing and upon motion for certification of conflict.
The application is presented under 14 headings, many of which it is not necessary to discuss because they are not dispositive of any of the ultimate questions of law decided.
In view of the many questions urged for the second time in the application it appears that counsel are desirous of having our opinion on the merits construed. We would commend another reading of our opinion.
The first exception noted is that in our statement of facts we said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Armour Co. v. Yoter.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Barber v. KhilkenOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Vukovich v. De BartoloOhio Court of Appeals · 1935