Chicago Professional Sports Ltd. Partnership v. National Basketball Ass'n
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
In January 1991, we enjoined the National Basketball Association (“NBA”) from reducing to 20 from 25 the number of games involving the Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership’s NBA team, the Chicago Bulls (“Bulls”), that WGN Continental Broadcasting Company (“WGN”) could televise as a superstation. Our opinion and decision are reported in 754 F.Supp. 1336-64 (N.D.Ill.1991) (“NBA I”). We there set out at some length the history of the NBA and of superstation telecasts of NBA games by the three superstations, WTBS,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership and Wgn Continental Broadcasting Company v. National Basketball Association, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Worldwide Basketball & Sports Tours, Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership and Wgn Continental Broadcasting Company v. National Basketball Association, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996