Legal Opinion
Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L/P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 28, 1991No. 89 Civ. 4900 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant SZS Associates, L.P. (“SZS”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P., for summary judgment of the personal injury action brought by plaintiff Eleanor Monaghan as guardian ad litem for her husband William Monaghan (“Mon-aghan” or collectively, the “Monaghans”). Additionally, SZS has also moved pursuant to Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ.P., for a protective order relating to certain discovery requests. For the reasons set forth below, SZS’s summary judgment motion is granted, and therefore SZS’s Rule 26 motion is no longer properly before this court.
The Parties
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Iannelli v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Pamela Sutera, and James Sutera v. Go Jokir, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.