Legal Opinion

Blake v. State of Conn. Dep't of Developmental Servs.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 4, 2019No. 17-3439-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3439-cv Blake v. State of Conn. Dep’t of Developmental Servs. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Serv., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  5. Blake v. Developmental ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API