Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Edwards

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action by E. M. Doyle against Charles L. Edwards, as administrator of Vito Francisco Crisci, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a directed verdict, and from an order modifying the same and denying a new trial. The plaintiff, a physician, brought this action against the defendant, as administrator of the estate of Vito Francisco Crisci, deceased, to recover the sum of $255 for professional services rendered him in his lifetime. The complaint contained three causes of action: ■ The first was for $5 for professional visits to the deceased; the second, for $250 for the performance of a surgical operation claimed to have been made upon the deceased under a special contract; and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Press v. . New York Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Whitehead v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Patchin v. SwiftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  4. Kramer v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Murray v. LeonardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. E. D. Metcalf Co. v. GilbertWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Arneson v. NergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lowe v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. ZickrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API