Legal Opinion

Persson v. Dukes

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 6, 1976No. 1318, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

Maryland has, as do most if not all of the states, a statute which provides that a legacy contained in a decedent’s will does not lapse because the legatee predeceased the testator. Statutes of this kind virtually turn around the common law rule, and although differing in some respects from state to state, they have a similar purpose. They express, for the vast majority of testators, a true intent which might otherwise go unexpressed, and at the same time, leave every testator entirely free to express a different intent. When the testator’s intent is supplied by the statute, it is supplied…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StarbuckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Maloney v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Maurer v. JohanssonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Vogel v. TurntCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. In Re Estate of ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Persson v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Murray v. WillettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Shimp v. ShimpCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Simpson v. PiscanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Simpson v. PiscanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API