Legal Opinion

Whatley v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 16, 1992No. 13-91-164-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice (Assigned).

Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, and the trial court, after finding the enhancement paragraph true, assessed punishment at sixty years in prison. Appellant raises two points of error, claiming that he should be acquitted because he was only indicted for robbery and because the evidence will not sustain a conviction for aggravated robbery. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The body of the indictment states, in pertinent part:... the Defendant, heretofore on or about August 31, 1990, did then and there unlawfully while in the course of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. DeDonato v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. State v. MurkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  3. Robert Scott Bryson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  4. Robert Scott Bryson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API