Brooklyn Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Byron Waters, McNabb, Hartzell & Hodge, and Holcomb & Coy, for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The writ of review was issued in this case for the consideration of constitutional objections urged against the validity of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act. All of those constitutional questions have been considered and disposed of in the opinion of this court in Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury, 170 Cal. 686, [151 Pac. 398].
Nothing remains saving one last contention of the petitioners, which is to the effect that the admitted facts attending the death of Charles Fremont Goering established that he met his death under circumstances which, under the terms of the act,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Wirta v. North Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Storm v. HoughtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.