Legal Opinion

Thomas D. Hays v. City of Urbana, Illinois

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 22, 1997No. 96-2425PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Section 8 of the United States Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, provides subsidies for low-income renters. So far as the national government is concerned, landlords may decide whether to, participate in § 8 programs. So far as the City of Urbana, Illinois, is concerned, landlords must participate. In January 1996 the City added “source of income” to the list of characteristics that landlords may not consider when choosing tenants. The function and admitted purpose of this ordinance is to require lessors to treat § 8 subsidies and vouchers the same way they treat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Virginia v. American Booksellers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kevin Sterk v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. State of Illinois v. City of Chicago, Illinois, and City of Gary, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Megan Lawson v. Curtis HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Deida v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
  5. BARTLOW v. ShannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API