Legal Opinion
Jack v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 20, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 17511PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNTON, District Judge.
The issue for determination here involves Rule 24(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A. Applicants for intervention have complied with the provisions of said rule. Defendant concedes the applicability of the rule in this situation but for the bar of the statute of limitations which defendant contends prevents the applicants from taking advantage of the rule. Defendant does not claim that applicants have not made “timely application” within the meaning of .the rule. As used in the rule, we understand it to be defendant’s position that the timeliness of the application…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- BTA Oil Producers v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. Randall & BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Korwek v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Engert v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.