Leonard v. Faber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Eberhard Faber, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of March, 1900, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 28th day of March, 1900, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial ■ made upon the minutes.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, Eberhard Faber, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of March, 1900, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 28th day of March, 1900, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial ■ made upon the minutes. Section 30 of the Stock Corporation Law (Laws of 1890, chap. 564), as amended by chapter-2 of the Laws of 1892, which went into effect January 14, 1892, requires that the annual…
1Opinion of the Court
Rumsey, J.:
The action was brought to recover from the defendant the amount of a debt due to the .plaintiffs for goods sold by them to the F. J. Kaldenberg Company between the 13th of June, 1892, and the 10th of December, 1892, and while the defendant was a director of the corporation, because the report required by section 30 of the Stock Corporation Law "was not filed in January, 1892, nor at any time during that year. The complaint alleged that at various times from the 13th of; June until the 10th of December, 1892, the plaintiffs sold to the Kaldenberg Company merchandise to the value of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Rudd v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Huntington v. . AttrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hager v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. KaldenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levine v. BehnNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Wesp v. MuckleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of MandelbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
- Woodhaven Bank v. Brooklyn Hills Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Woodhaven Bank v. Brooklyn Hills Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.