Legal Opinion

Woodhaven Bank v. Brooklyn Hills Improvement Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from trial term, Queens county. Action by the Woodhaven Bank against the Brooklyn Hills Improvement Company. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJenks, J.

The plaintiff sued upon three promissory notes, made subsequent to July io, 1893, and signed, “Brooklyn Hills Improvement Company, by C. G. Davison, Manager.” The answers raised the question of the authority of Davison to sign the notes. The plaintiff read in evidence a minute book of the defendant, wherein was a record ■of a meeting held July 10, 1893, setting forth the adoption of a resolution of authority in Davison. The defendant also read in evidence another minute book of the defendant, which contained a minute of the same meeting, but which did not show any resolution of such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. President of the Highland Turnpike Co. v. M'KeanNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. People v. Eureka Lake & Yuba Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Leonard v. FaberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Blake v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byrne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  2. Shelby v. New York Steam Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  3. Byrne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API