Legal Opinion
Silver Lining, Inc. v. Shein
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 6, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
37 N.J. Super. 206 (1955)
117 A.2d 182
SILVER LINING, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN P. SHEIN, ET ALS., INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS SHEIN'S EXPRESS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 19, 1955.
Decided October 6, 1955.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Kahn & Schildkraut, attorneys).
Mr. George Winne argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
Plaintiff brought this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Johnson v. Wells, Fargo & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
- Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Borough of Rumson v. PeckhamNew Jersey Tax Court · 1985
- State v. McCandlessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Jeter v. StevensonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. TurroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- North Bergen Tp. v. Dieckmann's EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.