Legal Opinion

Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 6, 1911No. 3 (1,452)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. Action by the United States against the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company. Judgment for the United States, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit in the court below instituted by the United States of America, defendant in error, against the Phil- ' *2adelphia & Reading Railway Company, plaintiff in error, for the recovery of a statutory penalty for a violation of an act of Congress, known as the “Safety Appliance Act” (approved March 2, 1893, as amended April 1, 1896, and March 2, 1903), in moving over its line of railroad, with its locomotive and its train crew, a car not equipped jn compliance with the terms of said act.

Judgment on verdict was rendered in favor of the United States, and the defendant…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fagan v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  3. Band's Refuse Removal, Inc. v. Fair Lawn Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Adams v. Peter Tramontin Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. In Re Blake's WillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API