Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Cash

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1939No. 28547PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note, given as part of the purchase price for a number of marble machines, the same being declared by statute to be gambling devices and prohibited by penal statute. The action was defended on the ground that the consideration of the note was unlawful and void as against public policy. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The only question presented is as to the validity and enforceability of the note.

Sections 9486 and 9487, O. S. 1931, define what constitutes unlawful contracts and read as follows:

“Section 9486. Those contracts are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swanger v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Garst v. Love WordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  3. Mann v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Williams v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. Thomas v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. An-Cor, Inc. v. RehermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Birdwell v. Tri-State Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Tulsa Energy, Inc. v. Oklahoma Oil & Gas Management, Inc. (In re Tulsa Energy, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API