Legal Opinion

Sirmans v. Citizens & Southern National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1974No. 49584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. "Where a judgment in favor of one of two parties litigant is reversed by the appellate court without direction, and where only questions of fact, or mixed questions of law and fact are involved, the legal result is a new trial, not the rendition of a judgment without trial and as a matter of course. Schley v. Schofield & Son, 61 Ga. 528.” Smith v. Smith, 119 Ga. App. 619, 620 (168 SE2d 609).

2. The rule has always been that the grant of a new trial is a de novo proceeding insofar as the right to amend by supplying additional germane allegations of fact is concerned. Glisson v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schley v. Schofield & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  2. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Mayor of Savannah v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Glisson v. Bankers Health C. Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Sirmans v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stafford Enterprises, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Marshall v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Wigley v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API