Legal Opinion

Sirmans v. Citizens & Southern National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1973No. 48371PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiff bank filed its affidavit of foreclosure on personalty, based upon five conditional sales contracts, to which defendant Sirmans filed an affidavit of illegality upon the ground, inter alia, that the principal and interest were not separated. The bank amended its affidavit, alleging that the sums sought included accrued interest, but again did not separate the amounts of principal and interest. The trial judge entered a lump sum judgment in favor of the plaintiff, which included both principal and interest, plus a 10% penalty for filing the affidavit of illegality…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. UsrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Dampier v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sirmans v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API