Powell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentBaird, Judge
Believing the collateral estoppel doctrine prohibits the admission of evidence of an offense for which one has been acquitted, I respectfiilly dissent to the resolution of the seventh, eighth and ninth points of error.
I
As a general rule extraneous offenses are irrelevant and inadmissible. Castillo v. State, 739 S.W.2d 280, 289 (Tex.Cr.App.1987); and, McCann v. State, 606 S.W.2d 897, 899-900 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). However, Tex.Code Crim.ProeAnn. art. 37.071 provides for the introduction of any evidence the trial judge deems relevant at the punishment phase of a capital murder trial. Therefore,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.