Legal Opinion

LAOYE v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 17, 2023No. 3:14-cv-05195Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AKINTOYE LAOYE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-05195 (GC) (DEA) MEMORANDUM & ORDER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ef al., Defendants. CASTNER, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff Akintoye Laoye’s “Emergency Motion,” which asks the Court to find that an affidavit of merit (“AOM”) is not required for Plaintiff's Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) claims against Defendant The United States of America (the “USA”). (See ECF No. 133.) The parties filed correspondence related to Plaintiff's request…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Ferreira v. Rancocas Orthopedic AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Palanque v. Lambert-WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Fink v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Tischler v. WattsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API