Legal Opinion
Fabe v. Facer Insurance Agency, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided July 20, 1984No. 83-2101PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BAKER, District Judge.
In this diversity action, the plaintiff, George Fabe (Fabe), Superintendent of Insurance of the State of Ohio, as liquidator of Proprietors’ Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation, with its principal place of business in Delaware, Ohio (P.I.C.), seeks to recover premiums and commissions from the defendant, Facer Insurance Agency, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, with its principal place of business in Rantoul, Illinois (Facer). More than $10,000 exclusive of interest and costs is at issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The material facts in the case…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cook Associates, Inc. v. Colonial Broach & MacHine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Champagnie v. WE O'Neil Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Haas v. CravattaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Walker v. LovittIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lincoln Towers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BoozellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Fabe v. Facer Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- George Fabe v. Facer Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Lincoln Towers Insurance Agency v. BoozellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Lincoln Towers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BoozellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.