Legal Opinion
Titeflex Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 5, 2014PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STRASSBURGER, J.
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (NUFIC) appeals from the order entered by the trial court on June 22, 2012, which ordered that NUFIC had a duty to defend Titeflex Corporation (Titeflex) in certain Underlying Actions pending in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Upon review, we affirm.
The trial court summarized the underlying facts as follows.
Titeflex manufactured a flexible connector that was installed and used at a Montgomery County gas station owned by Thomas F. Wagner and Thomas F. Wagner, Inc. (collectively, “Wagner”).1
In the Spring of 1998,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Melmark, Inc. v. Schutt by and Through SchuttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Sheard v. J.J. DeLuca Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Century Sur. Co. v. Essington Auto Ctr., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Schmitt, E. v. State Farm Auto InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Modern Equipment Sales & Rental Co. v. Main Street America Assurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.