Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. Accord Human Resources, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 2003No. 98,621PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.
{1 This controversy presents two questions. The first, whether the State Insurance Fund 1 (Fund) is entitled to an attor ney's fee, must be answered in the negative due to our recent opinion in State of Oklahoma, ex rel. State Insurance Fund v. Great Plains Center, Inc., 2003 OK 79, 78 P.3d 83. The second is whether the Fund is entitled to prejudgment interest. 'We conclude that it is so entitled, and also affirm the trial court's ruling on that issue.
{2 The controversy involves an action brought by the State Insurance Fund (Fund) against Defendants (Accord Human Resources, Inc.) to recover…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Withrow v. Red Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- In Re Lewis'adoptionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scruggs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Ryan v. American Natural Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Discover Bank v. WorshamCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Musket Corporation v. Star Fuel of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016